When Should You Walk Away From Your House?
The video is my appearance on Channel 12 News story on September 24, 2009 about the infamous "Buy and Bail." Surpisingly enough, they cut the most important pieces of what I said. . . .Or, not surprisingly.
What they didn't show of our 45 minutes of talking were these controversial and critical points:
The "Buy and Bail" is not the problem; it's a symptom of the problem. A problem that occurred years ago when the market was at its height when the legislators, realtors, lenders and builders didn't act ethically in their own rights; A negative equity problem that is currently not being addressed by our government.
They're focused on the monthly payment issue when it's much more widespread than that. The tiny percentage of people who actually qualify for a loan modification, don't make up the masses. The primary problem is being overlooked: Negative Equity. This problem is going to perpetuate and ail the housing market for years to come.
Why are people bailing? 3-5 years ago, builders sold new homes to investors while having buyers sign off on documents promising they weren't an investor. Some of these communities ended up having 50% or more investor population. What does that mean? They did zero upgrades, never lived in the home, and didn't landscape the back and/or front yard. That sure doesn't help the value of a property, especially when the investors were the first phase of bailing on properties because they couldn't find renters and couldn't afford to keep them.
3-5 years ago, what were the lending guidelines? Face it, there were none. If you could sign your name, you got a loan.
The current system has a gaping hole in it. The government is handing out money right and left to the crooks in corporate America, the unfortunate population that has become victim to the economy, and to the people who over-bought on homes and abused their credit.
But, WAIT! What about the huge percentage of the population that did all the right things? The people who are making good incomes, have high credit scores, saved and put 20% or more cash down on a home, got into a conventional mortgage, spent wisely and did not abuse their credit cards and rack up debt throughout the years, and yet are down hundreds of thousands of dollars in equity? I’ll tell you what. They’re left holding the bill for all the neighbors who have abandoned their homes for whatever reason, and the new people who are buying the same house for hundreds of thousands of dollars under what these people paid. They’re the people being scoffed at and called unethical.
This population of homeowners who put tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands cash down and in upgrades has been accused of being immoral for walking away as if they’re not losing anything. When you look at the history of the housing market over decades, you see that the value increases that we saw a few years ago will never happen again in our lifetime. That’s right, NEVER again will we see a home increase 100% or more in one year. With that factoid in mind, then how will these homeowners recoup $300,000 or more in equity? They won’t. Therefore, it can be a good financial decision to cut your losses short and start over. Are they supposed to feel good that they’re paying on jumbo mortgages when all of their neighbors are paying teensy weensy mortgages for the same house? Just because they can pay, doesn’t mean they should have to.
Everyday, I hear things like, “We didn’t plan on spending this much for a home. The lender told us we could” …… “I knew we couldn’t spend this much, but they gave us the loan!”………. “We had no idea how we would make these payments, we just thought we’d figure it out as we go”……… “I have $20,000 in credit card debt and am leasing a brand new BMW. I can’t afford this house payment!” Many of these people were given a free ride and walked away and looked upon as someone with financial “hardship”. Hey, I have all the sympathy in the world for the people who had true financial devastation hit from something bad like losing a job or divorce, but not because they were spend thrifts.
You know as well as I do that there are masses of people who created their own financial hardship, and they’re being rewarded for it. How is that right?
I’ve said it for the past 2 years and I’ll say it again. The people who are 200% or more down in equity and purchased their homes with good credit, money down and have not abused credit cards NEED a SOLUTION or the Buy and Bail will continue because it just plain makes good financial sense. Do the math. “You’ll ruin your credit” they all cry out. What did good credit get them? A swift kick in the a--.
Why don’t they come up with a solution modeled after the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 – which was extended to 2012 for a reason! If you bought a primary residence between 2003-2007, you put cash down, you can show income, you have good credit and you’re more than 40% down in equity from the mortgaged amount ---- you qualify for a principle reduction of xyz…. Now that makes more sense then letting all these properties foreclose, doesn’t it? Reward the people that DID THE RIGHT THINGS.
** You should always consult your realtor, CPA and a real estate attorney to decide what options you have to make a financial decision about your property. There are tax ramifications to consider. This is in no way intended to give advice or suggest people should walk away from their homes and mortgages. If you make a decision, whatever it is, you’re the one responsible. Don’t try to blame me and this article!

They're rewarding bad decisions and punishing the people who did NOT contribute to the demise of the real estate market by taking away the Down Payment Assistance programs. And, who's going to pay for it? WE ARE -the TAX PAYERS! So, not only am I making my mortgage payment on a house I overpaid for and I'm losing the value of my property, but now I have to pay to bail out my neighbor? At the risk of sounding like Denise Richard's potty mouth, ARE YOU %@!*%$@! KIDDING ME???!!!
So, you're saying that this is the American Dream? Julie Smith bought a house at $600,000 and is making her payments on time every month and can afford her home because she put 20% cash down. Julie's next door neighbor squeaked into their home with no money down and now they can't afford their monthly payments...along with 3 other neighbors. So, the four neighbors get bailed out and the values of the homes in the neighborhood have gone down. Meanwhile, the one homeowner who got into her home legitimately (Ms Smith) is still making payments on a $480,000 loan when her neighbors who live in the same floorplan are making payments on a $250,000 or so loan ?
What happened to the principle we’re taught to raise our children with: Reward good behavior, don’t bribe the kid with candy for not repeating bad behavior? Isn’t that what we’re doing? There are consequences for our actions. If certain people are given a “get out of jail free” card, then ALL of us who purchased a home in 2005 should get that same card.
What they should be doing is keeping the DPA programs. They’re punishing the WRONG people! The ones who are keeping our economy going are now being swiped of the opportunity if they don’t have $10,000, $20,000 or more sitting in a bank account.
The question SHOULD be: Why are they taking away a program that allows people who are well qualified with lengthy job history, good credit scores, and good income-to-debt ratios but don’t have a huge chunk of cash sitting in their bank- from buying the surplus of homes that are sitting on the market for sale? There is a big market of first time home buyers, people who are recovering from life changes such as divorce, and multi-cultural US citizens who are buying the inventory. A large percentage of this group does not have enough cash to cover the entire down payment and closing costs.
The question SHOULD be: Why weren’t the appropriate lending guidelines in place to qualify these buyers who are defaulting? If these guidelines are now in place, then why not let the people who do qualify get down payment assistance from the seller who is willing and able to offer it?
We should be focused on that point, not bailing out the people who caused this mess. I was raised with the principle that there are consequences for our actions, whether good or bad.
Instead, go to
Walk Away or Stay?
There are thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure who simply walk away from their properties and their mortgages. The lenders are left to deal with the financial fallout.
It’s starting to become a business decision and not just a financial duress decision causing homeowners to walk away. Many who owe more than their houses are worth abandon their homes and mortgages and it just might make financial sense, especially if you are not too concerned about the hit to your credit score.
Some homeowners are combining that strategy with a new one. They are buying new homes before their old homes go into foreclosure, and then walking away from the old homes and the old mortgages.
What these homeowners hope to achieve is getting out of their current untenable mortgage situations with a new home and a new mortgage. And it appears that so long as the homeowners don’t mind seeing their credit scores tumble, this strategy will work.
The homeowners will need to come up with a new lender and sizable down payment for the new home, but once they’re in, there is nothing that the old lender can do.
Since the new home with the new mortgage, has no connection to the old home and the old lender, the old lender can not come after the new home to collect any debt owed on the old home.
What is also a sign of the times is that there are now realtors who specialize in helping homeowners pursue this strategy and lenders who also specialize in these situations.
Is this the right thing to do? I was raised with traditional values that you should pay back the money you borrowed. However, when a colleague approached me with the concept, I have to admit that it made me think. I have clients who continually ask my advice about the home they purchased in the height of the market . . and when they consider the crushing blow they’re taking, they want to know what they can do.
Some have crunched numbers and it may take an additional 7 yrs to break even...and if there are short sales and foreclosures attracting buyers who can enter the neighborhood for up to $300,000 less than what others entered into - what does that mean to the neighborhood? Are these new neighbors taking care of their homes and their yards in the same manner? Are they upgrading and landscaping to the same level as those that paid hundreds of thousands more for their homes?
Even when the overall market returns, will the neighborhood be an entirely different community than when others purchased the home? And, if you’re at a time in life saving for retirement and the primary residence was supposed to be an appreciating asset - is it better to walk away with a minor ding on your credit for going through a short sale and "starting over"?
I don’t have the answers, but I can say that, suprisingly, this concept made me stop and consider!





